Hashim Tha\u00e7i ka deklaruar se \u00ebsht\u00eb i pafajsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr form\u00ebn e re t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr \u201cnxitje\u201d, e cila iu shtua pas nj\u00eb vendimi t\u00eb Apelit n\u00eb rastin e tij kund\u00ebr administrat\u00ebs s\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, ai \u00ebsht\u00eb i akuzuar s\u00eb bashku me Bashkim Smakajn, Fadil Fazliun, Isni Kilajn dhe Hajredin Ku\u00e7in.<\/p>\n
Deklarat\u00ebn e tij, Tha\u00e7i e ka dor\u00ebzuar me shkrim p\u00ebrmes mbrojtjes m\u00eb 24 prill 2025.<\/p>\n
\u201cN\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me Rregull\u00ebn 92 t\u00eb Rregullores s\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs dhe Provave, deklarata me shkrim e z. Tha\u00e7i p\u00ebr mospranim t\u00eb faj\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr secil\u00ebn pik\u00eb dhe akuz\u00eb n\u00eb Aktakuz\u00ebn e Rikonfirmuar t\u00eb ndryshuar, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb edhe form\u00ebn shtes\u00eb t\u00eb nxitjes p\u00ebr Pikat 1 deri n\u00eb 3, \u00ebsht\u00eb e bashkangjitur me k\u00ebto parashtresa\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb njoftimin e mbrojtjes s\u00eb Tha\u00e7it.<\/p>\n
M\u00eb 14 prill 2025, gjyqtarja e procedur\u00ebs paraprake, Marjorie Masselot, ka ndryshuar vendimin e saj t\u00eb m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr konfirmimin e aktakuz\u00ebs, k\u00ebshtu duke konfirmuar form\u00ebn e p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsis\u00eb penale p\u00ebr Tha\u00e7in q\u00eb bie n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb nenit 32 (3) t\u00eb KPRK-s\u00eb q\u00eb ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb p\u00ebr shtytje n\u00eb kryerjen e vepr\u00ebs penale t\u00eb \u201cPengimit t\u00eb personave zyrtar\u00eb n\u00eb kryerjen e detyrave zyrtare\u201d, n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb nenit 401 (3) dhe (5) t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Gjykata e Apelit e Dhomave t\u00eb Specializuara t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs (DhSK) n\u00eb Hag\u00eb ka aprovuar pjes\u00ebrisht ankes\u00ebn e Prokuroris\u00eb ndaj vendimit p\u00ebr konfirmimin e aktakuz\u00ebs n\u00eb rastin ndaj Hashim Tha\u00e7it, Bashkim Smakajt, Isni Kilat, Fadil Fazliut dhe Hajredin Ku\u00e7it, ku \u00ebsht\u00eb shtuar nj\u00eb form\u00eb e p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsis\u00eb penale ndaj Tha\u00e7it n\u00eb rastin kund\u00ebr administrimit t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb..<\/p>\n
Nga kat\u00ebr pika t\u00eb ankes\u00ebs s\u00eb ZPS-s\u00eb, u pranua vet\u00ebm ajo q\u00eb kishte t\u00eb b\u00ebnte me p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsin\u00eb e Tha\u00e7it p\u00ebr nxitjen e Kilajt, Smakajt dhe Fazliut p\u00ebr t\u00eb kryer vepr\u00ebn penale t\u00eb pengimit t\u00eb personave zyrtar\u00eb n\u00eb kryerjen e detyrave zyrtare.<\/p>\n
Paneli i Apelit ka marr\u00eb vendim q\u00eb nj\u00eb nga kat\u00ebr pikat q\u00eb kishte ngritur ZPS-ja kund\u00ebr vendimit p\u00ebr konfirmimin e aktakuz\u00ebs ndaj Hashim Tha\u00e7it, Bashkim Smakajt, Fadil Fazliut dhe Hajredin Ku\u00e7it, ta pranoj\u00eb lidhur me p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsin\u00eb penale t\u00eb Tha\u00e7it p\u00ebr \u2018nxitje\u2019 n\u00eb kryerjen e vepr\u00ebs penale \u201cPengim i personave zyrtar\u00eb n\u00eb kryerjen e detyrave zyrtare\u201d.<\/p>\n
Pika e kat\u00ebrt e ankes\u00ebs s\u00eb ZPS-s\u00eb, kishte t\u00eb b\u00ebnte me kund\u00ebrshtimin e konstatimit t\u00eb gjyqtares q\u00eb neni 32 (3) i KPRK-s\u00eb nuk zbatohet p\u00ebr vepr\u00ebn e \u201cPengim i personave zyrtar\u00eb\u201d sipas nenit 401 (3) dhe (5) t\u00eb KPRK-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Sipas ZPS-s\u00eb, gjyqtarja ka gabuar kur ka konstatuar se p\u00ebr shkak se neni 401 (3) dhe (5) t\u00eb KPRK-s\u00eb nuk parashikon d\u00ebnim deri n\u00eb pes\u00eb vjet burgim, p\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb neni 32 (1) nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i zbatuesh\u00ebm pasi sipas saj kjo dispozit\u00eb zbatohet vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr vepra q\u00eb jan\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebnueshme m\u00eb pak se pes\u00eb vjet.<\/p>\n
Sipas ZPS-s\u00eb, gjykat\u00ebsi i procedur\u00ebs paraprake ka gabuar duke konstatuar se, p\u00ebr shkak se neni 401 (3) dhe (5) i KPK-s\u00eb parashikon d\u00ebnim nga nj\u00eb deri n\u00eb pes\u00eb vjet burgim, neni 32 (3) nuk ishte i zbatuesh\u00ebm, pasi kjo dispozit\u00eb zbatohet vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr vepra t\u00eb d\u00ebnueshme me t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn pes\u00eb vjet burgim. Mbrojtja e Tha\u00e7it kishte th\u00ebn\u00eb se gjyqtarja e ka interpretuar sakt\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb nen.<\/p>\n
Neni 32 (3 ) i KPRK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr \u201cShtytje\u201d thot\u00eb se \u201cKushdo q\u00eb me dashje shtyt\u00eb personin tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb kryej\u00eb vep\u00ebr penale t\u00eb d\u00ebnueshme me s\u00eb paku pes\u00eb (5) vjet burgim dhe vepra penale as q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb tentuar, shtyt\u00ebsi d\u00ebnohet p\u00ebr tentativ\u00eb\u201d.<\/p>\n
Sipas Panelit, gjyqtarja kishte konstatuar se vepra q\u00eb bie n\u00eb nenin 401 (3) t\u00eb KPRK-s\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e d\u00ebnueshme nga 1 deri n\u00eb 5 vjet burgim, prandaj e p\u00ebrjashtoi p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsin\u00eb e Tha\u00e7it sipas nenit 32 (3) t\u00eb KPRK-s\u00eb p\u00ebr pik\u00ebn 1, 4 dhe 4 t\u00eb aktakuz\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Ve\u00e7 k\u00ebsaj, paneli kishte th\u00ebn\u00eb se ka mospajtime p\u00ebr interpretimin e k\u00ebtij neni pasi sipas tyre, panele m\u00eb t\u00eb ul\u00ebta kan\u00eb interpretuar q\u00eb ky nen \u00ebsht\u00eb i zbatuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr veprat penale t\u00eb d\u00ebnueshme mbi pes\u00eb vjet dhe disa p\u00ebr ato t\u00eb d\u00ebnueshme n\u00ebn 5 vjet.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb vendim thuhet se me shumic\u00eb votash, Paneli ka r\u00ebn\u00eb dakord me ZPS-n\u00eb, duke th\u00ebn\u00eb se neni 32 (3) duhet t\u00eb zbatohet p\u00ebr vepra q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshijn\u00eb ose edhe i tejkalojn\u00eb pes\u00eb vite burgim.<\/p>\n
\u201cSi rezultat, Paneli konstaton, me shumic\u00eb votash, se duke qen\u00eb se vepra e pengimit t\u00eb personave zyrtar\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e d\u00ebnueshme n\u00eb format e saj t\u00eb r\u00ebnduara me burgim nga nj\u00eb (1) deri n\u00eb pes\u00eb (5) vjet, forma e tret\u00eb e nxitjes sipas nenit 32(3) t\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e zbatueshme n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n
Si rrjedhoj\u00eb, ata e konsideruan gabim konstatimin e gjyqtares s\u00eb ky nen nuk ishte i zbatuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr vepr\u00ebn \u201cPengim i personave zyrtar\u00eb n\u00eb kryerjen e detyrave zyrtare\u201d. K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb paneli, pranoi pik\u00ebn kat\u00ebr t\u00eb ankes\u00ebs s\u00eb ZPS-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n
\u201cDuke qen\u00eb se konstatimi p\u00ebr ekzistenc\u00ebn e nj\u00eb dyshimi t\u00eb bazuar mir\u00eb se Tha\u00e7i i ka nxitur Fazliun, Smakajn dhe Kilajn p\u00ebr t\u00eb kryer vepr\u00ebn penale t\u00eb pengimit t\u00eb personave zyrtar\u00eb p\u00ebrfshin nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim faktik t\u00eb provave, \u00e7\u00ebshtja i kthehet Gjykat\u00ebsit t\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs Paraprake p\u00ebr shqyrtim t\u00eb m\u00ebtejsh\u00ebm\u201d, thuhet tutje n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n
Ndryshe, n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast Bashkim Smakaj, Fadil Fazliu dhe Isni Kilaj u arrestuan m\u00eb 5 dhjetor 2024 n\u00eb Kosov\u00eb dhe u transferuan n\u00eb objektin e paraburgimit n\u00eb DhSK, m\u00eb 6 dhjetor 2024 n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb aktakuz\u00ebs s\u00eb konfirmuar dhe fletarrestimeve t\u00eb l\u00ebshuara nga Haga.<\/p>\n
Nd\u00ebrsa, Tha\u00e7it i \u00ebsht\u00eb dor\u00ebzuar fletarrestimi n\u00eb objektin e paraburgimit n\u00eb Hag\u00eb m\u00eb 5 dhjetor 2024, gjithnj\u00eb sipas njoftimit t\u00eb DhSK-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Kurse, Hajredin Ku\u00e7it i \u00ebsht\u00eb dor\u00ebzuar aktakuza e konfirmuar dhe flet\u00ebthirrja p\u00ebr t\u2019u paraqitur para gjykat\u00ebses s\u00eb procedur\u00ebs paraprake p\u00ebr paraqitjen e par\u00eb, e cila u mbajt me 9 dhjetor.<\/p>\n
Sipas aktakuz\u00ebs, Tha\u00e7i individualisht dhe p\u00ebrmes veprimeve t\u00eb p\u00ebrbashk\u00ebta me grupet; Grupi Fazliu (Fadil Fazliu dhe Fahri Fazliu), Grupin Smakaj (Bashkim Smakaj, Blerim Shala dhe Artan Behrami) si dhe Grupin Kilaj (Isni Kilaj dhe VllaznimKryeziu), kan\u00eb ndjekur nj\u00eb model t\u00eb sjelljes p\u00ebr t\u00eb penguar personat zyrtar\u00eb n\u00eb kryerjen e detyrave zyrtare.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb aktakuz\u00eb thuhet se Tha\u00e7i ka udh\u00ebhequr dhe marr\u00eb pjes\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebto p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebrmes vizitave t\u00eb tij n\u00eb objektet e paraburgimit gjat\u00eb koh\u00ebs sa ishte i paraburgosur n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb gjykimit t\u00eb tij p\u00ebr krime lufte dhe krime kund\u00ebr njer\u00ebzimit.<\/p>\n
Aty thuhet se an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e grupit Fazliu, grupit Smakaj dhe grupit Kilaj u koordinuan p\u00ebr t\u00eb ndikuar n\u00eb d\u00ebshmitar\u00ebt e ZPS-s\u00eb gjat\u00eb vizitave jo t\u00eb privilegjuara t\u00eb datave 2 korrik, 9 shtator dhe 6 tetor 2023.<\/p>\n
Si rrjedhoj\u00eb, ndaj Tha\u00e7it r\u00ebndojn\u00eb tri akuza p\u00ebr pengim t\u00eb personit zyrtar n\u00eb kryerjen e detyrave zyrtare, tri p\u00ebr shkelje t\u00eb fsheht\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb procedur\u00ebs dhe kat\u00ebr akuza p\u00ebr mosbindje ndaj gjykat\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Nd\u00ebrsa, Kilaj, Smakaj dhe Fazliu akuzohen p\u00ebr tentativ\u00eb t\u00eb pengimit t\u00eb personave zyrtar\u00eb n\u00eb kryerjen e detyrave zyrtare dhe mosbindje ndaj gjykat\u00ebs. Kurse, Ku\u00e7i i ka dy akuza p\u00ebr mosbindje ndaj gjykat\u00ebs. \/Betimip\u00ebrDrejt\u00ebsi<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Hashim Tha\u00e7i ka deklaruar se \u00ebsht\u00eb i pafajsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr form\u00ebn e re t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr \u201cnxitje\u201d, e cila iu shtua pas nj\u00eb vendimi t\u00eb Apelit n\u00eb rastin e tij kund\u00ebr administrat\u00ebs s\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, ai \u00ebsht\u00eb i akuzuar s\u00eb bashku me Bashkim Smakajn, Fadil Fazliun, Isni Kilajn dhe Hajredin Ku\u00e7in. Deklarat\u00ebn e tij, Tha\u00e7i e ka dor\u00ebzuar me shkrim p\u00ebrmes mbrojtjes m\u00eb 24 prill 2025. \u201cN\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me Rregull\u00ebn 92 t\u00eb Rregullores s\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs dhe Provave, deklarata me shkrim e z. Tha\u00e7i p\u00ebr mospranim t\u00eb faj\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr secil\u00ebn pik\u00eb dhe akuz\u00eb n\u00eb Aktakuz\u00ebn e Rikonfirmuar t\u00eb ndryshuar, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":9067,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rank_math_lock_modified_date":false,"slim_seo":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[63],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shenjester.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9066"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shenjester.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shenjester.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shenjester.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shenjester.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9066"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/shenjester.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9066\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9068,"href":"https:\/\/shenjester.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9066\/revisions\/9068"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shenjester.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9067"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shenjester.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shenjester.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shenjester.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}